Toggle Side Panel
DiDacTec
DiDacTec
Close search
Back to Course

Top Teacher Theory 1: How people learn

0% Complete
0/0 Steps
  1. Welcome to Top Teacher Theory
    6 Topics
  2. How People Learn
    24 Topics
  3. Differentiation and Personalization
    35 Topics
  4. Understanding Learner Development
    17 Topics
  5. Your Feedback Matters 🙏

Participants 3

Lesson Progress
0% Complete

Photorealistic, high-resolution classroom scene where desks form a gentle ascending staircase of thought: in the foreground a confused student with irrelevant scribbles (pre-structural), then a child holding a single sticky-note fact (unistructural), a student with several disconnected notes (multistructural), a small group clustered around a connected concept map (relational) with a warm teacher kneeling beside them offering supportive eye contact and a reassuring hand on a shoulder (secure attachment), and at the top a student sketching a novel project that applies ideas in a new way (extended abstract). At the sides, one pupil waves for attention (seeking/ambivalent) while another sits withdrawn with crossed arms (rejecting). Soft daylight, shallow depth of field and warm cinematic tones highlight realistic expressions of curiosity, engagement, frustration and contemplation; background whiteboard displays a scaffolded sequence of tasks from simple to complex, and inclusive classroom details—books, posters and learning materials—enrich the scene.

(Think SOLO taxonomy without the jargon.)

  • Pre-structural: student has little or no relevant prior knowledge — answers are irrelevant or incorrect.
  • Unistructural: can use one relevant fact or idea.
  • Multistructural: can handle several disconnected facts.
  • Relational: integrates multiple aspects and shows relationships (compare/contrasts).
  • Extended abstract / hypothetical: reasons hypothetically, generalizes and applies to new situations.

Classroom tip: design tasks so students move up this ladder — start by activating prior knowledge, then scaffold to relational and hypothetical thinking.

Social development & attachment — the emotional engine for learning

Research shows that social interaction and emotional context shape learning and brain organization:

  • Secure attachment / safe teacher-student interaction → students are more curious, better motivated, and learn more readily.
  • Unstable (ambivalent/seeking) interaction → students often test relationships, seek attention, may act out to get noticed.
  • Rejecting interaction → students may withdraw, protest, or disengage entirely.

Practical consequences:

  • Before demanding high cognitive work, build a secure classroom environment. Students need to trust you to take risks and make mistakes.
  • Affective → cognitive → functional activation: students usually need to like the teacher/class (affective) before they engage cognitively, and only then will they use knowledge functionally.
  • For many boys, teacher approval strongly influences engagement; payoff: warm, consistent relationships reduce discipline problems and improve achievement.

Please take the quiz to proceed: