Sample roleplay: Mock Trial (classroom-ready template)

Purpose: practice persuasive reasoning, evidence evaluation and formal oral argument.

Time: 60–75 minutes (adaptable)
Materials: role cards, evidence slips, witness statements, verdict form, timer

Roles (example for a civic / language class):

• Judge (1) — keeps order, enforces time limits, reads verdict form.
• Prosecutor team (2–3) — presents case, calls witnesses, cross-examines.
• Defence team (2–3) — defends accused, cross-examines.
• Defendant (1) — may testify.
• Witnesses (2–4) — read prepared statements; optional improv answers under cross-exam.
• Jury (4–6) — listens, deliberates, returns verdict (binding for classroom).
• Clerk / Evidence manager (1) — organizes evidence packets and timeline.
• Observers (outer circle) — use rubric to give feedback.

Scenario (short sample)

• Case title: The Park Mural Dispute
• Charge: Vandalism? Community protest? Restorative action?
• Context: City mural painted overnight; property owner reports defacement. Painter claims community expression; owner claims damage. The case requires application of community standards, intent, restitution principles.

Preparation (teacher)

• Write short witness statements and evidence slips (photos, neighbor testimonies, city ordinance extract). Keep language clear and grade-appropriate.
• Print role cards with basic instructions and time allocations.
• Brief students on courtroom etiquette and time limits.

Procedure (60 min example)

1. Setup & role assignment — 5 min
2. Team preparation (prosecution & defence plan opening and witness order) — 10 min
3. Opening statements (2 min each) — 6 min
4. Witness testimony & cross-examination (3 witnesses, 6–8 min each incl. cross) — 24 min
5. Closing arguments (3 min each) — 6 min
6. Jury deliberation & verdict (10 min) — 10 min
7. Debrief & feedback (use rubric, emotional check, reflection prompts) — 10–15 min

Guidance: limit speaking time strictly; model a good opening statement; coach students to cite concrete evidence rather than opinion.

Sample witness card (example)

• Witness: Neighbour (Ms. K.)
• Statement: “I saw a person paint the mural between 10pm and midnight. They left a note saying it was community art. I did not see any damage to the wall before.”
• Cross-exam prompts for opposing team: Where were you standing? Could you identify the painter? Did you see any tools or graffiti? How do you know the note’s author?

Jury instructions (simplified)

• Consider only evidence presented.
• Base verdict on standard of proof set by teacher (e.g., “preponderance of evidence”).
• Deliberate respectfully, record reasons for decision.

Debrief prompts (mock trial)

• What evidence changed your mind (if anything)? Why?
• Which cross-examination questions were most effective and why?
• How did taking a role change your understanding of the issue?
• If the case returned to you tomorrow, what would you ask differently?

Assessment & follow-up

• Use the rubric for jury and observer feedback.
• Optional written assignment: each student writes a 300-word reflection as their role or as themselves, comparing initial assumptions to what they learned.
• Re-run the same case at the end of the unit (or provide a slightly altered version) to measure development in reasoning and solution models.

---

Variations and extensions

• Mini‑trial (20–30 min): single witness, rapid openings and closings, quick jury.
• Restorative circle: replace verdict with community reparative plan; emphasises empathy and restitution over guilt.
• Cross-curricular: adapt case to science ethics, historical reenactment, literature character trials.
• Digital extension: record proceedings, have students edit and annotate video for self-assessment.