Toggle Side Panel
DiDacTec
DiDacTec
Close search
Back to Course

AA Top Teacher Theory vol 2_1: Classroom Activities

0% Complete
0/0 Steps
  1. From Theory to Plan: Translating Principles into Lessons
    32 Topics
  2. Active Learning Strategies
    44 Topics
  3. Differentiation and Personalized Learning
    5 Topics
  4. Formative Assessment: Techniques and Use
    4 Topics
  5. Classroom Management: Routines, Procedures and Environment
    5 Topics
  6. Collaborative Learning and Group Work
    6 Topics
  7. Questioning, Feedback and Scaffolding
    5 Topics
  8. Technology Integration and Digital Activities
    6 Topics
  9. Inclusive Practices: Equity, ELL and SEN Strategies
    7 Topics
  10. Reflection, Action Research and Professional Growth
    4 Topics

Participants 3

Lesson Progress
0% Complete
A warm, documentary-style snapshot of a diverse middle school classroom during formative assessment: students at desks hold small whiteboards and markers—some flashing thumbs-up or thumbs-down—while the teacher walks between rows collecting tiny folded exit-ticket slips into a tray. Two students lean over a worksheet in a focused CER-style evidence discussion, pointing and deliberating; another student writes quickly on paper. Authentic classroom details—pencils, papers, backpacks and blurred posters—are caught in soft natural window light and a shallow depth of field. Hands and the teacher are in sharp focus; candid expressions and body language convey collaboration, reflection and the quiet, purposeful energy of learning.

Formative checks embedded:

  • Thumbs/mini whiteboards during guided practice
  • Pair CER worksheet review
  • Exit ticket (individual, collected)

Suggested Rubric for Inference (use for exit ticket and homework)

  • Advanced (3 pts): Claim is insightful; two precise pieces of textual evidence are cited; reasoning is clear and convincingly links evidence to claim.
  • Proficient (2 pts): Claim is reasonable; two relevant pieces of evidence (may be paraphrase); reasoning exists but could be clearer.
  • Emerging (1 pt): Claim is vague or general; evidence insufficient or absent; reasoning missing or unclear.
  • No evidence/No submission (0 pts).

Use formative results to plan follow‑up mini‑lessons: e.g., targeting students who confuse inference with summary or who use opinion without textual support.

Summative option: A short quiz or paragraph exam later where students infer across longer texts, or include inference as rubric item in an analytical essay.